Zephier v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls, 752 N.W. 2d 658, 234 Ed. Law Rep. 358 (SD 2008) (Defendants have the burden of proof on statute of limitations defense)
Mahoney & Hagberg v. Newgard, 729 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 2007) (Absolute privilege also bars claims sounding in defamation that is claims where the injury stemmed from and grew out of the defamation)
Brief of Amicus Curiae for Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association (MDLA) in the matter of
Hornberger v. Wendel, et. al., A08-0903, (Minn. Ct. App. April 14, 2009) (defense counsel and an insured have an attorney-client relationship based on the insurance policy such that defense counsel has the authority to initiate a defense on behalf of the insured client even if the client cannot be contacted initially)
Hornberger v. Wendel, et. al., A08-0903, (Minn. Ct. App. April 14, 2009) (defense counsel and an insured have an attorney-client relationship based on the insurance policy such that defense counsel has the authority to initiate a defense on behalf of the insured client even if the client cannot be contacted initially)
Meinsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. (Birthday spankings do not come within the Workers Compensation intent to injury exception) MDLA Amicus Brief
Sipe v. Fleigles Transportation & Services, Inc. (Frye-Mack motions) - MDLA Amicus Brief
|
